VOLUME 5 (1992), ISSUE 3
- Manuscripts:
- BENNY SHANON
Are connectionist models cognitive?
ANDREW APTER
Depersonalization, the experience of prosthesis, and our cosmic insignificance: The experimental phenomenology of an altered state
WILLIAM LYONS
Intentionality and modern philosophical psychology (PART III): The appeal to teleology
Discussion: McCauley on Normative Naturalism
ELLEN R. KLEIN
Is 'normative naturalism' an oxymoron?
ROBERT McCAULEY
Defending normative naturalism: A reply to Ellen Klein
ELLEN R. KLEIN
Normative naturalism undefended: A response to McCauley's reply
-
Abstract:
If naturalism is correct, then McCauley is wrong; if it is not correct, then McCauley is wrong still. At its heart epistemology either is or is not normative. If it is not normative, then we ought to follow Quine into the lab (of course, we will have to get in line behind the Churchlands). However, if epistemology is essentially normative, then the 'age of cognitive science' will have no bearing on its progress.
Book Review:
HAROLD GOUZOULES
Review of DOROTHY CHENEY & ROBERT SEYFARTH's How monkeys see the world